JODY
ALIESAN
DEBORAH A. MIRANDA
ROY D. WILSON

CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY |
|
These days, especially in a city, our definition
of culture/ community is often something other than geographic: it's a matter
of affinity, experience, solidarity, common purpose and struggle. For example,
I consider myself a member of:
the women's community, ever since the second wave of feminism
in the late 60's early 70's, when I had the first experience of my words
being useful to others, the function of the "cultural worker";
what I will call, in order to be most inclusive, the queer community:
gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans-gendered people;
the "counter-culture"
or "alternative" community, although I might not choose those
labels;
and other communities, such as those who have suffered rape, or
clinical depression.
But my sense of the place of the poet in
a culture has come most (consciously or unconsciously) from what's leaked
into me out of my Irish ancestory. |
|
| |
Gaelic bards were perceived as a particular
obstacle by the colonizers, not just because they epitomized a cultural
tradition which the occupiers hoped to destroy, but, more practically, because
they were figures of political influence in their own right, second only
to the chieftains, to whom they sat next in council.
DECLAN KIBERD,"Irish Literature and Irish History," The
Oxford Illustrated History of Ireland.
|
|
| |
|
In ancient Irish/Gaelic culture, the people,
led by their chieftains, were married to the land. But there was an itinerant
learned class who moved with safe conduct around the country, uniting the
nation:
the druids
(a word I hesitate to use because of what's been invented about them by
New Age writers. If you read anything that claims to know what the druids
believed or what rituals they used, it's creative writing. Everything was
oral, and it was all lost). They were priests, healers, and philosophers;
the brehons,
who were judges, legal counselors, and scholars of the law;
the bhards,
who kept the genealogies, and recited the eulogies and elegies; and
the filii, the poets, who were the seers, historians, and
keepers of the myths and sagas. They looked forward and backward and spoke
of what they saw.
All this was orally produced and transmitted,
and the filii studied 21 years before they were considered poetsthey
were walking libraries among the clans, and members of scholarly communities.
Most important
to me is their twofold function: telling the truth, and speaking for
those who cannot speak for themselves. Giving them words. The poets
were called to sit beside chieftains because they could be counted on to
do this. And they were protected from the consequences.
After this ancient
culture was finally crushed, the poets became dispossessed outcasts sheltered
by the people; itinerant teachers and custodians of literacy during the
Penal Years of the Seventeenth Century when the native Irish were forbidden
education. They were hunted down, because they raised the spirit of the
people and reminded them of their history, of who they were. Their power
of critique and satire was feared.
So what does this
mean for me, personally? What does it have to do with the present? During
the reign of the English King Henry VIII, ancient Irish manuscripts on animal
skin were cut into strips and used to stiffen the spines of English books.
Now these books are being taken apart and the strips recovered. One of them
includes a fragment that reads: "The poet is the wick in the lamp of
the community. Not the oil, and not the flame; but the simple piece of cloth
that unites the two so that the people can see their own light."
I am a member
of communities. I feel a responsibility to them. Being a poet is a job,
a calling, a way of life (also a doom, a fate, and a curse). It's a function
among other human beings, an absurd assignmentbut somebody has
to do it.
So I contribute
to my communities as a poet by doing things like organizing benefit readings
for Hands Off Washington; or providing an invocation at Tilth's 20th Anniversary
conference; dedicating royalties (such as they are), or donating books and
performances to auctions. Most of all I believe I contribute by living my
life, writing about what moves me, from my community-influenced point of
view, and telling the truth: pursuing it down through the mazes of my own
self-delusion and denial.
But here's the
central paradox: I can do this best if I'm separate, detached, standing
one step away, independent and spiritually itinerant. If I don't belong
to anyone, no one owns me. Then I can speak the truth, even if I'm
not protected from the consequences.
It's a matter
of binocular vision: one eye is the personal "I", the ego, the
personality; the other is the mythic eye, that sees my life as representative
of human experience. So my community, my culture, is our common humanity.
I aspire to speak for that.

|
|