
contents

|
|


Pivotal poets
by Bill Shively
Two pivotal poets appeared in my career roughly ten years apart.
In many ways they are opposites; in many ways they came at optimum times
in my personal development.
In 1974 and '75 I lived in San Francisco. I was fully aware of its poetic
mystic and heritage and I was chomping the bit to connect with it. I told
people of my desires and fledgling efforts; I read widely, drank hugely
and hung out in North Beach. On the bulletin board to the basement of City
Lights was a handwritten notice on the flap of an envelope: Word Liberation
with Harold Norse. The timing as I say was perfect. His writing style, his
life style, his workshop style were all inspirational.
An overlooked beat poet,
his work is imbued with music and sex, clearly committed to observation
and creative juxtaposition. His cynicism is clear and restrained. Open and
honest, he taught automatic writing and serious,studied, self-editing. They
were heady times, those weekly meetings in his cold water walk-up. Ken Wanio,
Neeli Cherkovski, David Moe, Jack Hirschman and others slamming me up and
down, sideways, and then going out for burgers and beer after...
Any time I find writers that are willing
to talk critically about each others' work over beer I am enthralled.
However, another pivotal
poet, kept to himself, drank little, and broached no critique of his work.
What he provided was an even more dramatic and effective demonstration of
the value of self editing. In the mid '80's I lived in Kyoto. Cid Corman
had been there for twenty some, thirty, years. He wrote daily, prolifically.
His work comprehensive and compressed. Long poems were eight, ten, fifteen
lines.
It was a rough beginning.
I resented his aloof, elite attitude. In a group where I was working with
others building community, he seemed to be doing little than advertising
his presence, his books, his superiority. Unbidden,I delivered unto him
fifty or sixty of my recent poems. I pestered him until he consented to
read and discuss his response.
I brought a bottle of wine.
His critique of my work
was brief, but he agreed to discuss poetics: his poetics. So, we set up
pattern. I would arrive; he would hold forth, answering questions as I brought
them forward; and then I would ask if he had any other books to sell (he
was not working, and, though his wife's cake shop was doing well, there
was little poetry income other than the Basho day celebrations, for which
I am sure he was paid something). I learned from Cid that the essence of
imagist poetry is in most of my best work. I also realized that I could
never aspire to be like someone else-- I needed to get my own line, my own
attack, my own rhythm. We agreed finally in this: to be great at what one
writes is more than not making the mistakes of others. Being great is more
than replicating the success of others.
While Cid Corman is exponentially
different from Harold Norse, they both hold to this same truth.

|
|